<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Effective Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.effective-media.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.effective-media.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 09:36:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why X Factor vs RAM is important by Tweets that mention Why X Factor vs RAM is important &#124; Effective Media -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.effective-media.co.uk/2009/12/why-x-factor-vs-ram-is-important/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Why X Factor vs RAM is important &#124; Effective Media -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 09:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.effective-media.co.uk/?p=345#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Donato Esposito, Nicola and topsy_top20k, topsy_top20k_en. topsy_top20k_en said: Another blog piece mentioning me - how cool beep beep http://bit.ly/5DzXe4 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Donato Esposito, Nicola and topsy_top20k, topsy_top20k_en. topsy_top20k_en said: Another blog piece mentioning me &#8211; how cool beep beep <a href="http://bit.ly/5DzXe4" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5DzXe4</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why X Factor vs RAM is important by Twitted by nicolathefiat</title>
		<link>http://www.effective-media.co.uk/2009/12/why-x-factor-vs-ram-is-important/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by nicolathefiat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 06:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.effective-media.co.uk/?p=345#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by nicolathefiat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by nicolathefiat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 +1 PR Tips on radio interviews by how to fix bad credit</title>
		<link>http://www.effective-media.co.uk/2009/11/radio-is-still-no-1-for-influence/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>how to fix bad credit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.effective-media.co.uk/?p=301#comment-25</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;how to fix bad credit...&lt;/strong&gt;

I can\&#039;t believe I haven\&#039;t been to this website before!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>how to fix bad credit&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I can\&#8217;t believe I haven\&#8217;t been to this website before!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why X Factor vs RAM is important by Why X Factor vs RAM is important &#124; Effective Media &#124; TVPhoneMedia.com</title>
		<link>http://www.effective-media.co.uk/2009/12/why-x-factor-vs-ram-is-important/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Why X Factor vs RAM is important &#124; Effective Media &#124; TVPhoneMedia.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.effective-media.co.uk/?p=345#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post: Why X Factor vs RAM is important &#124; Effective Media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post: Why X Factor vs RAM is important | Effective Media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Businessmen don&#8217;t drink my wine (anymore) by Why X Factor vs RAM is important &#124; Effective Media</title>
		<link>http://www.effective-media.co.uk/2009/12/the-changing-pr-landscape-for-music/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Why X Factor vs RAM is important &#124; Effective Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.effective-media.co.uk/?p=330#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8230;what do we do?          &#171; Businessmen don&#8217;t drink my wine (anymore) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8230;what do we do?          &laquo; Businessmen don&#8217;t drink my wine (anymore) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bank Charges : Top 5 PR Tips for the Banks by Welcome :: OlyKit: Software Reseller</title>
		<link>http://www.effective-media.co.uk/2009/11/bank-charges-3-top-5-pr-tips-for-the-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Welcome :: OlyKit: Software Reseller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.effective-media.co.uk/?p=288#comment-20</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Welcome :: OlyKit: Software Reseller...&lt;/strong&gt;

While Chinese banks are seeing a credit boom due to the nation’ s huge stimulus package, their foreign peers have not been so lucky and might just be facing their most difficult period as far as business expansion in China is concerned. According to th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Welcome :: OlyKit: Software Reseller&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>While Chinese banks are seeing a credit boom due to the nation’ s huge stimulus package, their foreign peers have not been so lucky and might just be facing their most difficult period as far as business expansion in China is concerned. According to th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bank Charges : Top 5 PR Tips for the Banks by keith</title>
		<link>http://www.effective-media.co.uk/2009/11/bank-charges-3-top-5-pr-tips-for-the-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.effective-media.co.uk/?p=288#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Many thanks for your feedback, Brian. I know you can&#039;t magic hegemony when there isn&#039;t one. But then again the media tends to reflect customer opinion. I agree, &quot;banks&quot; have an image problem, so why don&#039;t they collectively form a Customer Focus Board (Marketing would be a dirty word right now). I know the BBA can&#039;t oversee such a move but are these people who run these institutions so remote from reality? This sweeter than thou image is not one that sits well with the customers. Not all MP&#039;s are the same either.But they have made a collective effort to restore public coincidence. Meanwhile the banks attempt to stay on a moral high ground. A legal ruling is one thing. Common sense is another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for your feedback, Brian. I know you can&#8217;t magic hegemony when there isn&#8217;t one. But then again the media tends to reflect customer opinion. I agree, &#8220;banks&#8221; have an image problem, so why don&#8217;t they collectively form a Customer Focus Board (Marketing would be a dirty word right now). I know the BBA can&#8217;t oversee such a move but are these people who run these institutions so remote from reality? This sweeter than thou image is not one that sits well with the customers. Not all MP&#8217;s are the same either.But they have made a collective effort to restore public coincidence. Meanwhile the banks attempt to stay on a moral high ground. A legal ruling is one thing. Common sense is another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bank Charges 2: The Reckoning by keith</title>
		<link>http://www.effective-media.co.uk/2009/11/ahem-now-for-the-big-push/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.effective-media.co.uk/?p=268#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Thank you for taking the trouble to reply, Brian. I take your point and of course strictly you are correct and know more about the sector than I. However we are also talking about perception here. There are very many people, like myself, who feel that banks have an influence on the nature of our economy. Its ethics are almost iconic.

I suppose if we&#039;re not careful, we could go on for weeks about this topic, but I suspect neither of us have the time. I concede that my statement was loose but also feel very strongly that we, as a major stakeholder, are asked to support the banks when the going gets tough. And yet the treatment many of us have received when we needed their support has been, to say the least, shabby. 

The difference between bad banking practice and bad customer practice is huge. Here&#039;s a customer who has been recently refused a mortagage by Natwest as a result of complete incompetence by HSBC in 2003/4. And yet its the banks who stick together like gangsters - even though they are in &quot;fierce competition&quot; with each other - against the customer. I know I am talking about two different things here. 1) bank charges 2) credit rating. And yet the two are related certainly in my case. Karen King&#039;s comments spoke for many of us when the news broke. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8376906.stm 

When was the last time a bank was stopped doing what it&#039;s always done for six whole years or effectively fined for treating a customer like something that&#039;s just crawled from beneath a rock? That&#039;s what I am facing. And yet I am being told by a leading opinion former that I should have managed my account better. My point is that the bank in question, HSBC should have handled my affairs more sensibly. I bet they payed more than £2400 to DG Solicitors to take me to the cleaners! There are no ethics in that whatsoever.

I also understand that the BBA can&#039;t speak for individual banks or accounts. But, by the same token, I think the BBA do have an inherent responsibility to set a climate for conciliation on this issue of bank charges and many other matters, I note that bodies like the OFT and FSA are looking at this issue in detail. But this will not have any effect on the thousands of people who feel totally let down by the &quot;closed shop&quot; retail banking system which exists in the UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for taking the trouble to reply, Brian. I take your point and of course strictly you are correct and know more about the sector than I. However we are also talking about perception here. There are very many people, like myself, who feel that banks have an influence on the nature of our economy. Its ethics are almost iconic.</p>
<p>I suppose if we&#8217;re not careful, we could go on for weeks about this topic, but I suspect neither of us have the time. I concede that my statement was loose but also feel very strongly that we, as a major stakeholder, are asked to support the banks when the going gets tough. And yet the treatment many of us have received when we needed their support has been, to say the least, shabby. </p>
<p>The difference between bad banking practice and bad customer practice is huge. Here&#8217;s a customer who has been recently refused a mortagage by Natwest as a result of complete incompetence by HSBC in 2003/4. And yet its the banks who stick together like gangsters &#8211; even though they are in &#8220;fierce competition&#8221; with each other &#8211; against the customer. I know I am talking about two different things here. 1) bank charges 2) credit rating. And yet the two are related certainly in my case. Karen King&#8217;s comments spoke for many of us when the news broke. <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8376906.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8376906.stm</a> </p>
<p>When was the last time a bank was stopped doing what it&#8217;s always done for six whole years or effectively fined for treating a customer like something that&#8217;s just crawled from beneath a rock? That&#8217;s what I am facing. And yet I am being told by a leading opinion former that I should have managed my account better. My point is that the bank in question, HSBC should have handled my affairs more sensibly. I bet they payed more than £2400 to DG Solicitors to take me to the cleaners! There are no ethics in that whatsoever.</p>
<p>I also understand that the BBA can&#8217;t speak for individual banks or accounts. But, by the same token, I think the BBA do have an inherent responsibility to set a climate for conciliation on this issue of bank charges and many other matters, I note that bodies like the OFT and FSA are looking at this issue in detail. But this will not have any effect on the thousands of people who feel totally let down by the &#8220;closed shop&#8221; retail banking system which exists in the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bank Charges : Top 5 PR Tips for the Banks by BritishBankers</title>
		<link>http://www.effective-media.co.uk/2009/11/bank-charges-3-top-5-pr-tips-for-the-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>BritishBankers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.effective-media.co.uk/?p=288#comment-17</guid>
		<description>British Bankers&#039; Association again. Thanks for these tips. You&#039;ve got something here.

The problem for us is that we&#039;re the British Bankers&#039; Association, not the Bankers&#039; Marketing Board (no there isn&#039;t one). Each bank does its own marketing and PR, and each is in fierce competition with all of the others.

Your five tips are certainly valid, and we&#039;d love to take at least some of them on board, but that would assume a hegemony among the banks which doesn&#039;t exist. The media and certain commentators are very happy to denigrate &quot;the banks&quot; as if all of them were equally responsible for the credit crunch - as if all investment banks were the same as all retail banks, as if the problem only originated in the UK and as if there isn&#039;t considerable professional pride in the industry and concern that its reputation has eroded so badly. But there are worlds of difference between some of our members, and within the term &quot;banking&quot; there are many different business models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>British Bankers&#8217; Association again. Thanks for these tips. You&#8217;ve got something here.</p>
<p>The problem for us is that we&#8217;re the British Bankers&#8217; Association, not the Bankers&#8217; Marketing Board (no there isn&#8217;t one). Each bank does its own marketing and PR, and each is in fierce competition with all of the others.</p>
<p>Your five tips are certainly valid, and we&#8217;d love to take at least some of them on board, but that would assume a hegemony among the banks which doesn&#8217;t exist. The media and certain commentators are very happy to denigrate &#8220;the banks&#8221; as if all of them were equally responsible for the credit crunch &#8211; as if all investment banks were the same as all retail banks, as if the problem only originated in the UK and as if there isn&#8217;t considerable professional pride in the industry and concern that its reputation has eroded so badly. But there are worlds of difference between some of our members, and within the term &#8220;banking&#8221; there are many different business models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bank Charges 2: The Reckoning by BritishBankers</title>
		<link>http://www.effective-media.co.uk/2009/11/ahem-now-for-the-big-push/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>BritishBankers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.effective-media.co.uk/?p=268#comment-16</guid>
		<description>British Bankers&#039; Association here. No no no. Can&#039;t let you get away with your statement: &quot;You didn’t manage our economy properly and there’s plenty of your primary stakeholders out there who would agree with me. &quot;

Sorry we didn&#039;t know we were supposed to be managing the economy. We thought we provided services to people who wanted to use a bank, that&#039;s all.

The Government manages the economy, more or less. And the Bank of England works to keep inflation in check. Meanwhile banks do banking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>British Bankers&#8217; Association here. No no no. Can&#8217;t let you get away with your statement: &#8220;You didn’t manage our economy properly and there’s plenty of your primary stakeholders out there who would agree with me. &#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry we didn&#8217;t know we were supposed to be managing the economy. We thought we provided services to people who wanted to use a bank, that&#8217;s all.</p>
<p>The Government manages the economy, more or less. And the Bank of England works to keep inflation in check. Meanwhile banks do banking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

